Maria Gilmanova, a Russian archer, is facing strong criticism for her recent visit to the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, particularly Crimea, during Russia's large-scale invasion of Ukraine. This action has ignited controversy and condemnation from international observers and human rights organizations.

The visit of Gilmanova to the occupied areas of Ukraine is seen as a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty and a direct affront to the ongoing war. It also raises questions about the neutrality and ethical responsibility of athletes. The international community emphasizes that athletes should act as role models for fair play, inclusivity, and respect for human rights, rather than contributing to the promotion of aggressive actions or undermining international norms.

Gilmanova's actions serve as a reminder that sports and politics are closely intertwined, and athletes' decisions can carry significant weight in shaping public opinion. As tensions continue to escalate, it is crucial for athletes to consider the impact of their actions on global perceptions of their sport and their respective countries. The incident involving Gilmanova underscores the need for athletes to be aware of the broader implications of their actions and to uphold the principles of fair competition, sportsmanship, and respect for international law.